The article was first published in
You see a "fixer-upper" with potential. The architect sees a blank canvas. But the Israel Tax Authority? They just see a pile of bricks—and that distinction could cost you hundreds of thousands of shekels.
In Israeli real estate taxation, the definition of a "Residential Apartment" (Dirat Megurim) is the golden ticket. It grants you lower Purchase Tax brackets (or exemptions for single homes) and significant exemptions from Appreciation Tax (Mas Shevach) upon sale.
However, a series of recent court rulings in 2025 has sharpened the guillotine. It is no longer enough for a property to be zoned for residence or for you to intend to live there. If the property fails the "Physical Test"—specifically, if it lacks basic facilities like a kitchen or a toilet at the moment of sale—you are walking into a tax trap.
Here is what three recent District Court rulings teach us about the gap between a "house" and a "taxable home."
1. The "Shell" Trap: No Kitchen, No Discount (Krasni Case)
In the case of Krasni v. Director of Real Estate Taxation (Appeal 39040-09-22, March 2025), the buyer purchased a luxury "Shell Apartment" (Dirat Ma'atefet) from a developer in Jaffa.
The Scenario: The contract explicitly stated the apartment was a "shell"—concrete walls, no flooring, no kitchen, no bathrooms, and no internal partitions. The buyer argued that since it was zoned for residence and he intended to finish it and live there, he should pay the reduced Purchase Tax applicable to a single residential apartment.
The Verdict: The court rejected the appeal. Judge Kirsch and the committee ruled that the test is objective, not subjective.
- The Logic: A concrete box without a shower, toilet, or kitchen cannot be used for living today. Therefore, it is not a "Residential Apartment"; it is "Other Real Estate Rights" (like a plot of land), taxed at a flat, higher rate (currently 6%).
- The Lesson: Potential doesn't count. If you buy a shell to customize it yourself, be prepared to pay higher taxes than if the developer had installed a basic kitchen before handing over the keys.
2. The "Ruins" Trap: Potential is Irrelevant (Orion Case)
If Krasni dealt with a new apartment, the Orion v. Director of Real Estate Taxation case (Appeal 10100-07-22, March 2025) dealt with an old one.
The Scenario: A receiver sold a property in the desirable Neve Tzedek neighborhood. The structure had been neglected for years, disconnected from water and electricity meters, and stripped of sanitary fittings. The seller claimed the "Appreciation Tax Exemption" for a residential apartment.
The Verdict: The exemption was denied. The court ruled that a property that has been physically severed from utility infrastructure and lacks basic sanitary facilities ceases to be a "Residential Apartment" for tax purposes.
- The Logic: The court applied the "Physical Test" rigorously. Even though the property was in a residential neighborhood and had been a home in the past, its current physical state—a "ruin"—disqualified it.
- The Lesson: If you are selling a dilapidated property, "fix it up" before the sale. Reconnecting water and installing a basic toilet could save you a fortune in Appreciation Tax.
3. The "Force Majeure" Defense (Eisler Case)
While the courts are strict on physical condition, they showed surprising flexibility regarding timelines in the case of Eisler v. Director of Real Estate Taxation (Appeal 22899-10-22, May 2025).
The Scenario: A new immigrant (Olah) purchased an apartment "on paper." To qualify for the reduced Purchase Tax benefit for immigrants, the law generally requires moving into the property within a specific timeframe. However, due to contractor delays and COVID-19 travel restrictions, she received the key and moved in more than three years later—well past the statutory deadline. The Tax Authority tried to revoke her benefit.
The Verdict: The court ruled in favor of the immigrant. Judge Dorot applied a "purposive interpretation."
- The Logic: The delay was not the taxpayer's fault. Since she made every effort to move to Israel and the delay was caused by the contractor and the pandemic, penalizing her would defeat the legislative purpose of encouraging Aliyah.
- The Lesson: While physical definitions are rigid, timelines can be flexible if you can prove "Force Majeure" or circumstances beyond your control.
